![]() |
![]() |
© 1996 - 2010 European Publishers Council All rights reserved
|
< back to press updates
EPC news - February / March 2005The monthly update on EU media issues
EPC presents 2005 wish list essential for a healthy, competitive, innovative and independent European media marketOver the coming months, the EPC is briefing the President and European Commissioners with the following specific requests on their approach to issues affecting the media sector: Advertising:
Copyright:
Media Concentration:
VAT:
EPC issues high on Commission and Presidency agendasThe next five years promised to be extremely busy for the European Publishers Council with both Commission President Barroso and UK and Luxembourg Presidencies including many EPC priority issues in their work plans. President Barroso included the following as part of his strategic objectives presented to the European Parliament in January:
Meanwhile the UK and Luxembourg Presidencies are planning progress on copyright, a commitment to the development of a genuine internal market and named the modernisation of VAT as one of their objectives.
Presidency objectives relevant to the EPC:
AdvertisingPharmaceuticals and food face possible regulatory changesIt’s up and down in the advertising debate with Commissioner Kyprianou
considering banning food advertising targeted at children on the one hand
whilst Commissioner Verheugen is supporting the proposal to repeal the ban
on pharmaceutical advertising to make all information about medicines and
pharmaceutical products more easily available to the public.
Self regulationNew code of ethics for agency sector In its continued commitment to
promote and preserve self-regulation, the advertising industry has
launched a new and binding code of ethics for the agency sector across the
EU.
Threat to country of origin principle undermines Internal Market Services DirectiveDirective held up by country of origin debateThe country of origin debate continues in the context of the Services Directive – a directive designed to facilitate cross-border trade, facilitate the establishment of businesses cross-border; facilitate the provision of services, temporarily or occasionally; facilitate the movement of temporary workers around the EU; and simplify administrative and bureaucratic requirements that currently pose an obstacle to the proper functioning of the single market. The country of origin principle would allow service providers who operate legally in one Member State to operate temporarily or occasionally in another without being subject to a whole new set of regulations. Debate has so far been largely against country of origin although Commissioner McCreevy is apparently as yet undecided. Meanwhile French President Chirac has openly criticised the Directive and demanded a re-draft. Surprisingly, German Chancellor Schroeder, despite his original support for the liberalisation of Services, is now joining France in his call for the European Commission to rethink the opening of services to cross-border competition. The German industry association has expressed disappointment about his U-turn which now supports German trade unions. In the light of the Services debate, a Commission-backed report concludes that liberalisation of the EU’s services industry would create up to 600,000 jobs, raise productivity and reduce prices to consumers. The report also finds that it is the Member States with the larger but highly-regulated services sectors that stand to benefit the most. These include the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Finland, Austria and Italy. All Member States, however, stand to benefit from increased employment. This study was based on 275,000 companies in Europe. The directive will go to the European Parliament for its First Reading in June or July. Unfair Commercial Practices: Council won’t back down on Country of Origin As with the Services Directive, the Unfair Commercial Practices directive is designed to improve an apparent lack of consumer confidence in cross-border trading in goods and services by stamping out rogue trading and unfair practices including misleading advertising. The latest text, which cannot now be changed outside the formal Treaty-based revision, forbids the use of advertising as a direct means of inciting children to buy a product or persuade their parents that it should be bought. As with the Unfair Commercial Practices directive, the Council has made it clear that it will not re-introduce the country of origin principle. Disagreement over Country of Origin is also responsible for the current state mate on the regulation on Sales Promotion. The Directive was adopted in plenary by the European Parliament this week and is expected to be formally adopted by the Council of Ministers in the coming weeks. However, the Council stated that it could not accept some of the MEPs' resubmitted proposals. In particular, with regard to the 'common market' clause, the Council refused to reintroduce the 'country of origin' principle. This point serves to link this directive on unfair commercial practices to the services directive and the text regulating sales promotions (currently blocked in Council over the 'country of origin' principle). The directive also outlaws adverts that "encourage children to use 'pester-power' to make adults buy a product and adverts that directly tell children they must buy a product." In addition, the law lays down general principles, which can be used to assess whether other types of practices should be prohibited as unfair. For more information click here.
The deputy coordinator in the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Joachim Wuermeling (EPP-ED/CSU) spoke of "the right step for the protection of consumer interests." Unfair commercial practices targeted include adverts asking children to put demands on their parents with false offers, advertising in the guise of the provision of information, fake sales, and snow ball systems. He emphasized that the directive would strike a balance between the need to protect consumers' interests and different trading practices and consumer preferences in Europe. European consumers have to rely on certain minimum standards due to the growing trade between EU Member States, Wuermeling said. This would not mean a forced harmonisation of all consumer practices from Finland to Sicily or Poland to Portugal, he claimed. On Wuermeling’s initiative the European Parliament wants to make sure that the background of every individual case is judged in detail. For consumers, Wuermeling expects "better legal certainty". While German law, for example, until now only includes a few general clauses, it would in future be complemented by a clear and precise list of outlawed practices. According to Wuermeling, the directive offers the necessary flexibility for innovative business methods. Furthermore, the harmonisation would enable Europe-wide marketing strategies, which used to fail because of 25 different legal orders. Now these will be possible due to the reciprocal recognition of national decisions, Wuermeling said.
For more information on any of the following issues, contact Heidi
Lambert Communications. Internet regulation ContactsAngela Mills, Director of EPC: Tel: +32 2 231 1299 (Brussels) or +44 1865 310 732 (UK) angela.mills@epceurope.org. Heidi Lambert Communications: Tel: +44 1245 476 265 heidilambert@hlcltd.demon.co.uk.
|
|||||||